Comparing FUE VS FUT Hair Transplant Techniques
before and after male hair transplant

Comparing FUE VS FUT Hair Transplant Techniques

before and after male hair transplant

When considering treatment for a balding head or a receding hairline, your doctor may have recommended either an FUE or FUT hair transplant. Both procedures are effective solutions for hair loss, but the question to be asked is: FUE VS FUT hair transplant — which of the two is better for you?

In this guide, we’ll help you decide the better hair transplant option and clear up any questions, such as the difference between FUE and FUT, pros and cons, success rates, and the ideal candidates for each method.

Defining FUT & FUE

Generally, hair transplantation involves extricating hair follicles from the body (the donor area, typically from parts of the head where hair is thicker or from other parts of your body) to a section where hair is thinning, balding, or missing (the recipient area). Hair transplants primarily treat male pattern baldness.

The two main hair transplant procedures are Follicular Unit Transplant (FUT) — also called the strip method — and Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE). The primary difference between the two is that in FUT, the surgeon excises a strip of the scalp’s skin, removes the individual follicular units, and transplants said follicles to the recipient area. This is a more invasive process, and it involves using stitches to close the wound edges. When using FUE, these hair follicles are directly extracted and relocated without excising skin.

FUE VS FUT Pros and Cons

While both are fantastic hair loss solutions and produce natural-looking results, the FUT and FUE methods come with certain pros and cons.

FUE Hair Transplant Advantages

  • no incisions and sutures
  • minimal scarring, only tiny round scars
  • quicker recovery

FUE Hair Transplant Disadvantages

  • requires shaving the donor area
  • the process of graft extraction is time-consuming
  • more expensive

FUT Hair Transplant Advantages

  • gives the highest yield of hair
  • the process takes less time
  • less expensive

FUT Hair Transplant Disadvantages

  • linear scarring
  • longer recovery period

Which is Better — FUE or FUT?

In choosing between the two FUE and FUT, it’s important to note there are more factors to consider beyond the advantages and disadvantages; the best hair restoration method is dependent on the patient’s needs and their desired outcome. For example, a patient who struggles with significant balding and requires a large number of grafts may get better results from FUT.

Your surgeon will also review certain things to determine which procedure best suits you, such as the hair loss pattern, amount of grafts needed, and the quality and amount of the donor hair. It’s also possible that both techniques will be recommended for fuller hair restoration.

FUE VS FUT Success Rate

Both methods have excellent success rates, though it also depends on several factors, namely the patient’s overall health, the severity of the hair loss, and the plastic surgeon’s expertise.

If you’re looking for an experienced surgeon for a hair transplant in Los Angeles, reach out to our team at Burbank Hair Transplant.


More FUE VS FUT Hair Transplant FAQs

Are hair transplants expensive?

Hair transplants can be expensive. The cost is highly variable, depending on the amount of hair to be transplanted.

Between FUE and FUT, the former is more expensive. This is due to the time and process it will take to extract hair follicles. However, it’s especially worth it if you’re looking into the procedure that gets you back to your usual routine faster.

How long does FUT hair transplant last?

The transplant can last a lifetime when performed by a skilled surgeon and with proper care by the patient. This also goes for the FUE method.

It’s vital to remember that it’s normal for transplanted hair follicles to fall out before regrowing permanent follicles. This is part of the hair’s natural lifecycle and transplant process.

Share this post:

Recomended Reading

Reccomended Reading