Thinning on top? Hair transplant treatments are by far the most effective way to restore a fuller head of hair. However, with several hair transplant treatment options available to choose from, it can be difficult to know which hair transplant technique is best.
If you want to better understand the difference between hair transplant options such as NeoGraft vs FUE by hand, in this article we highlight how the various treatments differ so you can decide which is right for you.
What Is FUE Hair Transplant?
FUE, or Follicular Unit Extraction, is the modern evolution of hair transplants. It is performed by extracting individual hair grafts from a donor site on the head, before implanting them into the recipient site.
Manual FUE is performed entirely by hand by a surgeon. While it does require very precise artistry, it is considered the gold standard in hair transplantation because of the excellent, natural-looking results it can achieve.
NeoGraft vs FUE Hair Transplant: What’s the difference?
NeoGraft is an automated form of FUE. Using a device with a piston-driven motor which uses pneumatic pressure, individual hair grafts are harvested from the donor site, before being implanted into the desired area using a specialized tool which provides control over the depth of insertion.
Is NeoGraft better than FUE manual harvesting?
The benefit of opting for NeoGraft is that a greater number of graft transplants can be performed in a much shorter period of time, and without the need for any incisions or sutures. This means that excellent results can be achieved in a matter of hours rather than days.
However, there are some disadvantages. NeoGraft doesn’t provide the same level of precision and control as manual FUE. The automated suction action of the NeoGraft device can also damage some hair grafts, preventing the follicle harvest from being utilized to its full potential.
Punch size is another key difference between the two treatments. While a skilled and experienced surgeon performing manual FUE typically leaves a punch size between 0.7-0.8mm, NeoGraft leaves a slightly larger punch size of 0.9mm which can result in some visible scars.
What’s the difference between NeoGraft vs ARTAS?
ARTAS is another automated FUE technique which, like NeoGraft, can perform hair transplants in a much shorter amount of time compared to manual FUE. Using computer imaging, the ARTAS robotic device selects and extracts thick and healthy hair follicles, and automatically implants them into the donor site.
There are however some disadvantages compared to NeoGraft and manual FUE—the extraction process is significantly slower than NeoGraft, and it also has a slightly larger punch size (1mm). The results are also unlikely to look as natural as what a surgeon with meticulous attention to detail can achieve when performing manual FUE.
Restore a thicker head of hair at Burbank Hair Transplant
If you’re comparing NeoGraft vs hair transplant using another method, the experienced team at Burbank Hair Transplant can discuss the various options with you and help you select the right treatment for your personal situation. If suitable, we can even combine treatments to create a more customized solution that will achieve the best possible result. In fact, you can get the best of both worlds with our tailored treatments — our highly skilled technicians can have our NeoGraft technology assist with manual FUE as needed.
Take a look at some of the results we’ve been able to achieve for other patients or get started by requesting a free scalp analysis.
